Commentaries:
Jamieson, Fausset, and Brown
are an allegory—rather, "are allegorical," that is, have another besides the literal meaning.
these are the two covenants—"these [women] are (that is, mean; omit 'the' with all the oldest manuscripts) two covenants." As among the Jews the bondage of the mother determined that of the child, the children of the free covenant of promise, answering to Sarah, are free; the children of the legal covenant of bondage are not so.
one from—that is, taking his origin from Mount Sinai. Hence, it appears, he is treating of the moral law (Galatians 3:19) chiefly (Hebrews 12:18). Paul was familiar with the district of Sinai in Arabia (Galatians 1:17), having gone thither after his conversion. At the gloomy scene of the giving of the Law, he learned to appreciate, by contrast, the grace of the Gospel, and so to cast off all his past legal dependencies.
which gendereth—that is, bringing forth children unto bondage. Compare the phrase (Acts 3:25), "children of the covenant which God made . . . saying unto Abraham."
Agar—that is, Hagar.
Other Jamieson, Fausset, and Brown entries containing Galatians 4:24:
Genesis 21:10
John 8:35
2 Corinthians 3:6
Galatians 1:17
Galatians 2:16
Galatians 4:26
Galatians 5:1
DISCLAIMER: Church of the Great God (CGG) provides these resources to aid the individual in studying the Bible. However, it is up to the individual to "prove all things, and hold fast to that which is good" (I Thessalonians 5:21). The content of these resources does not necessarily reflect the views of CGG. They are provided for information purposes only.
