BibleTools
verse

(e.g. john 8 32)
  or  

Genesis 26:26
Compare all

Book Notes
   Barnes' Book Notes
   Jamieson, Fausset, and Brown Book Notes
   Robertson's Book Notes (NT)
Commentaries
   Adam Clarke
   Barnes' Notes
   Forerunner Commentary
   Jamieson, Fausset, and Brown
   John Wesley's Notes
   Matthew Henry
   People's Commentary (NT)
   Robertson's Word Pictures (NT)
   Scofield
Definitions
Interlinear
Library
Topical Studies
X-References
Library

<< Genesis 26:25   Genesis 26:27 >>


Articles, Bible studies, and sermons that contain Genesis 26:26:

Genesis 26:26-29
Excerpted from: Isaac and the Day of Small Things

The Philistine king did not want to lose the weather gage, so to speak, the advantage of the earlier covenant with Abraham. To prevent that development, he may have journeyed south to Beersheba, which was arguably on the fringes of his own sphere of influence, in hopes of capitalizing on Abraham’s earlier covenant with the Philistines in order to get Isaac on his side—to beat the Hittites at their own game. It is to be noted that Abimelech did not ask Isaac to visit him; he is willing to travel some distance—outside his own domain—to meet with Isaac.

Abimelech actually condemns himself with his own words, does he not, admitting that he recognizes Isaac to be a godly person, but still sent him away! It is also noteworthy that the king has no scruples in using God’s name in his efforts to gain his objectives, something at which modern politicians remain adept as well.

At any rate, I am not sure how peacefully the Philistines sent Isaac away up there in verse 16. Remember, the context of Isaac’s departure from Gerar, as stated in verse 14, is that the Philistines envied Isaac—coveting his wealth. Relations had become strained—as reflected in the frequent and apparently protracted struggles over water rights. But the Philistine diplomats paint the picture in sanguine colors, referring to their “peaceful” relationship. These were consummate politicians.

Now, in the case of Isaac’s Abimelech, the terms of their covenant are much the same, although peace becomes an explicit concern, perhaps because the Abimelech of Isaac’s day feels politically or militarily threatened. Isaac’s Abimelech, however, fails to mention the preservation of the land. Apparently, the Abimelech of Isaac’s day did not have as much regard for the stewardship of the land as did Abraham’s Abimelech. The king says to Isaac,

Peace is an issue, but there is in this case no reference to land management.

Genesis 26:26-27
Excerpted from: Resistance (Part Three): Persistence

“I had it good there in Gerar, things were going nice. I was rich. I still am. I had this land that I could use, and I was cultivating it and making a hundredfold of this and that and the other thing, and my flocks and my herds were all prospering, and you had to send me away. It could have been a good relationship. Why are you coming to me now?”


Articles

From Sheriff to Shepherd: Are We Willing to Be Defrauded?  
Scattering and Gathering: Images of History and Prophecy (Part Two)  

Sermons

Unifying Behaviors  



<< Genesis 26:25   Genesis 26:27 >>



Start Your Day with Scripture

Begin each morning with God's Word — the Berean delivers a daily verse and insightful commentary to spark reflection and growth.

Join 140,000+ fellow believers on this journey.

Free and spam-free — unsubscribe anytime.

Leave this field empty
©Copyright 1992-2026 Church of the Great God.   Contact C.G.G. if you have questions or comments.
Close
E-mail This Page