|
Leviticus 16:10
The New King James Version (NKJV) translates Leviticus 16:10 as: But the goat on which the lot fell to be the scapegoat [azazel] shall be presented alive before the LORD, to make atonement upon it, and to let it go as the scapegoat [azazel] into the wilderness. Contrast this with the New Revised Standard Version (NRSV) translation: . . . but the goat on which the lot fell for Azazel shall be presented alive before the LORD to make atonement over it, that it may be sent away into the wilderness to Azazel. Did you catch the shocking difference? The NKJV reads that the live goat was chosen to be the azazel. In this translation, azazel describes the role that this goat fills: to be taken away, bearing the nation's sins, so they are completely removed. However, the NRSV (along with some other modern translations) reads that this goat was to be sent to Azazel. In other words, the translators do not interpret the goat as the azazel, but rather that the goat is sent to a personality named Azazel! Some scholars see "Azazel" as a name because compound nouns—nouns made of two words—are often proper nouns (names) in Hebrew. The Hebrew word azazel appears to be a compound noun, so the possibility exists that it is a name. While the Hebrew allows for it, it does not require it. What tips the scale for modern translators is Jewish folklore. Between the testaments, Jewish folklore invented a lesser demon named Azazel, who was blamed for all human sin (see The Book of Enoch). A millennium after Leviticus 16, the word azazel had been turned into a name. Many Jews of this time used a saying that reveals how they intertwined Scripture with folklore: "On the day of atonement, a gift to Sammael" (see The Judgment, Its Events and Their Order by J.N. Andrews, pp. 78-81). These Jews viewed the live goat as an offering sent to Samael, the Devil, who blended with their myth of Azazel, as folklore is wont to do. A significant difference exists between the goat being chosen "to be" the azazel and it being "sent . . . to" a personality, a demon, named Azazel! Let this sink in: If, at God's command, the Israelites sent a sacrificial animal to Azazel—if this biblical ritual was designed to appease or even acknowledge a demon—the Israelites would be committing gross idolatry at God's instigation! It is an appalling assertion. Regardless of the thoughts of some Jews in the centuries before Christ or what translators think the Hebrew suggests, the live goat could not possibly represent a gift or offering sent to a demon. Not only is sacrificing to demons directly prohibited in the very next chapter (Leviticus 17:7), but God says right in the covenant not even to mention the names of other gods (Exodus 23:13). In Deuteronomy 12:3, He commands Israel to destroy the names of false gods wherever they find them. He declares in Exodus 22:20, "He who sacrifices to any god, except to the LORD only, he shall be utterly destroyed." Yet, modern translators and other scholars would have us believe the holy God not only enshrined the name of a demon in the instructions for this solemn day, but He also intended His people to acknowledge or even placate this false god with a sacrificial animal. He did not. Instead, He commanded an Israelite to lead a substitutionary animal bearing the nation's sins away from the camp, prefiguring the Messiah. God called that animal azazel, "complete removal." If we stick to God's Word, we get a single, cohesive scenario. If, however, we borrow ideas from this anti-God world, something very different and destructive emerges, twisting the truth of God. As Paul writes, such doctrines of demons lead to people departing the faith (I Timothy 4:1). We must reject the cup of demons and drink only from the cup of the Lord (I Corinthians 10:21).
David C. Grabbe
Inventing Goddesses and Demons (Part Three)
|
