BibleTools
verse

(e.g. john 8 32)
  or  

Genesis 48:2
Compare all

Book Notes
   Barnes' Book Notes
   Jamieson, Fausset, and Brown Book Notes
   Robertson's Book Notes (NT)
Commentaries
   Adam Clarke
   Barnes' Notes
   Forerunner Commentary
   Jamieson, Fausset, and Brown
   John Wesley's Notes
   Matthew Henry
   People's Commentary (NT)
   Robertson's Word Pictures (NT)
   Scofield
Definitions
Interlinear
Library
Topical Studies
X-References
Commentaries:


No entry exists in Forerunner Commentary for Genesis 48:2.

Genesis 48:1-6
Excerpted from: The Doctrine of Israel (Part Twelve): Joseph

The first is that the extent of the birthright as he sets it up here, is limited to being fruitful and multiplying and inheriting the land. He does not go any further than that. There is no promise of spiritual blessings or of any kind of kingship because that scepter promise we find in the next chapter, goes to Judah, not to Joseph. And so those things, with the coming of the Messiah and all that, all those spiritual blessings that would come through Him, they are not part of the birthright that was given to Joseph and his two sons.

The second thing that we need to pick out here is that Jacob, when he first begins to talk to Joseph, immediately calls them Ephraim and Manasseh, not Manasseh and Ephraim as they are introduced in the first verse of the chapter. He turns it around immediately and says, Ephraim and Manasseh, Ephraim first and then Manasseh.

Third point, despite those two boys being his grandsons, Jacob adopts them as his sons. He pulls them up a generation, if you will, and he makes them superior to his first two sons. He specifically mentions Reuben and Simeon, which are one and two in the birth order of Jacob. But he says, "No, these two, Ephraim and Manasseh, will be one and two." It is almost as if he is replacing them, I guess he is, replacing them on top of the heap. So, Jacob's sons really should go Ephraim, Manasseh, then Rueben, then Simeon, because he pulled them up and made them his adopted sons as his firstborn sons. So, Ephraim and Manasseh slot in above the other sons of Jacob in terms of inheritance. They go straight to the top—head of the class. They are firstborns now. Both of them our firstborns.

The fourth point, if Joseph had any other children, and we have no idea whether he did or not, he may have, there is nothing in the Bible that says he had other children, but Jacob takes care of the possibility that that would occur. Joseph was evidently still a fairly young man and his wife fairly young too. But if they had any other children, they would be considered either Ephraimites or Manassites. They would not begin their own tribe. Like I said, we have no record of any other children by Joseph, but Jacob's charge here that they would be slotted in under Ephraim and Manasseh as either Ephraimites or Manassites takes care of that possibility.




Other Forerunner Commentary entries containing Genesis 48:2:

Genesis 32:28

 

<< Genesis 48:1   Genesis 48:3 >>

Start Your Day with Scripture

Begin each morning with God's Word — the Berean delivers a daily verse and insightful commentary to spark reflection and growth.

Join 135,000+ fellow believers on this journey.

Free and spam-free — unsubscribe anytime.

Leave this field empty
©Copyright 1992-2026 Church of the Great God.   Contact C.G.G. if you have questions or comments.
Close
E-mail This Page